Which type of review is NOT typically a part of assurance reviews for projects?

The type of review that is not typically a part of assurance reviews for projects is the Process Improvement Review. Assurance reviews are systematic evaluations conducted throughout the lifecycle of a project to ensure that it is on track and aligned with its objectives, scope, and governance standards.

Project Validation Reviews, Project Assessment Reviews, and Gateway Reviews are integral to this framework. They focus on validating project viability, assessing risks, and ensuring that key decision points (gateways) are met before moving onto the next phase. These reviews help identify issues early and provide necessary insights for successful project delivery.

In contrast, a Process Improvement Review is generally more focused on evaluating and enhancing the processes themselves, rather than specifically assessing the project's conformity and progress. While process improvement is essential for organizational development, it does not fit within the typical assurance framework that aims to ensure project effectiveness and alignment with strategic goals.